Social Media, Internet & Socio-emotional Development in Middle Adulthood

‘All the lonely people, where do they all come from?’ (Lennon & McCartney, 1966)

Current social development is profoundly influenced by processes of urbanization, globalization, fragmentation of society and societal immersion in technology-mediated environments. The Internet, most notably, is often quoted with negative effects across nations such as contributing to the decline of face-to-face social interaction, social isolation and corresponding increase in loneliness and depression (Amichai-Hamburger et al., 2011, p.584). Online communication in virtual communities does not translate into extended offline networks and friendships (Pollet et al., 2011) while promoting loneliness, dating anxiety, communication anxiety and unpopularity anxiety (Odaci & Kalkan, 2010).

On the contrary, online users appear to enjoy larger personal networks than non users (Zhao, 2006) while Internet use is positively related to extended contacts with people of the same political interest, same religion, same profession as well as contacts to friends and family (Amichai-Hamburger et al., p.587).  Both opposing findings lead to conclude that a distinct ‘Internet effect’ does not exist (Haase et al., 2001). The Internet appears to exercise an amplifying and bifurcating effect on predisposional conditions such as e.g., for low- or high-self esteem individuals (Utz & Beukeboom, 2011).  The effect on children who use electronic media too early and unsupervised for extended periods of time may however be devastating. Frequent exposure to violent content of TV programs in middle childhood is a strong predictor for aggressive and abusive behavior extending into lifespan (Arnett, 2012, p.330).

Children who spend their time online and miss out on forming peer relationships are unlikely to develop essential social skills such as pro-social intentions and behavior, dealing with social values and norms, others’ variability, issues such as intimacy and self-disclosure, intrapersonal development fostered in peer-relationships, the resolution of internal conflicts, development of identity and the ability to deal with critical feedback from others (Parker et al, 2006).If such ‘internal working models’ (Bowlby, 1982) are not developed early, problems such as depression, loneliness, increased risk of mental disorders and maladjustment are likely to appear in later life (Parker, p.119-130).

How single adults may improve their social-emotional development

Adult singlehood appears not primarily related to insecure attachment styles. In individualistic cultures long-term singlehood is related to higher levels of depression, general anxiety and sexual dissatisfaction while it is associated with factors such as painful life events (Schachner et al., 2008, p.489-490). In socio-centered cultures singles often care for their ageing parents (Arnett, 2012, p.533) and have a meaningful role to play. Singlehood is on the rise across Asian countries (Jones & Zhi, 2012, p.732). Co-residence with parents, networks of gratifying friendships, career-advancement, creating patchwork families(Leeson, 2013), cohabitation (Arnett, p.438-439) or mentoring and developing the next generation with the experience of middle adulthood render options for social-emotional development. Online dating sites offer opportunities although criminal exploitation casts some shadow on online-dating (Whitty & Buchanan, 2012).

Social development in middle adulthood is characterized, according to Erik Erikson’s developmental theory, by the conflict of generativity (caring for the well-being of the future generation) versus stagnation (Arnett, 2012, p.2012). This includes, as a late parent or grandparent, assisting and helping children through their development and to educate them in digital media. An adult person with high IT-skills combined with mid-life expertise would be of tremendous benefit to his/her family and others. The high level of self-acceptance, autonomy and environmental mastery of adults (Ryff, 1995) empowers persons in middle adulthood to play key-roles in education and organizations. Social networks are an ideal medium to facilitate such role.

Conclusion

Besides the influence of digital communication factors such as urbanization and the promotion of individualistic lifestyles diminish spheres for social interaction. A critical discussion would need to assess how compensatory interventions such as social-emotional learning programs (Durlak et al, 2011)need to be accompanied by a general discourse on social lifestyle values and digital media literacy.

 

References

Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Hayat, Z. (2011). The impact of the internet on the social lives of users: A representative sample from 13 countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 585–589.

Arnett, J. J. (2012). Human development: A cultural approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). London: Hogarth Press.

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.

Jones, G., Yanxia, Z., & Zhi, P. (2012). Understanding high levels of singlehood in Singapore. Journal Of Comparative Family Studies, 43(5), 731-750.

Leeson, W.L. (2013). Demography and Society. Oxford institute of Population Ageing. Retrieved from http://www.ageing.ox.ac.uk/research/themes/family

Odaci, H., & Kalkan, M. (2010). Problematic Internet use, loneliness and dating anxiety among young adult university students. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1091–1097.

Lennon, J. & McCartney, P. (1966). Eleanor Rigby On ‘Revolver’ [record]. Location: Parlaphone

Parker, J., Rubin, K., Price, J., & de Rosier, M. (2006). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment. In D. Cicchetti, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol 2. Risk, disorder, and adaptation (pp. 96–161). New York, NY: Wiley.

Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. G. B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). Use of social network sites and instant messaging does not lead to increased offline social network size, or to emotionally closer relationships with offline network members. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 14(4), 253–258.

Ryff, C.D. 91995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 99-104

Schachner, D. A., Shaver, P. R., & Gillath, O. (2008). Attachment style and long-term singlehood. Personal Relationships, 15(4), 479-491. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00211.x

Utz, S., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2011). The role of social network sites in romantic relationships: Effects on jealousy and relationship happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(4), 511–527

Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. (2012). The online romance scam: A serious cybercrime. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, And Social Networking, 15(3), 181-183. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0352

9 thoughts on “Social Media, Internet & Socio-emotional Development in Middle Adulthood

  1. Hey I am so grateful I found your webpage, I really found you by accident,
    while I was browsing on Aol for something else, Nonetheless I am here now and would
    just like to say cheers for a incredible post and a all round interesting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read through it
    all at the minute but I have bookmarked it and also added your RSS feeds,
    so when I have time I will be back to read much
    more, Please do keep up the great job.

  2. My spouse and I absolutely love your blog and find many off your post’s tto be precisely what I’m looking
    for. Do you offer guest writers to write content
    available for you? I wouldn’t minjd producing a post or elaborating on
    a lot of the ssubjects you write regarding here. Again, awesome weeb log!

  3. I don’t drop a great deal of comments, but I looked at a few of
    the responses on Social Media, Internet & Socio-emotional Development in Middle Adulthood | Joana
    Stella Kompa. I do have a couple of questions for you if you do not mind.
    Is it only me or do some of the remarks appear as if they are coming from brain dead visitors?
    😛 And, if you are writing at other online social sites, I’d like to follow you.

    Could you list of every one of your social networking sites like your linkedin profile, Facebook page
    or twitter feed?

    • You made a good point. I looks like a new generation of spam. Some flattering lines but without any relation to what I wrote. As I got more and more of those I got suspicious and my spam-filter prevented more than a 1,600 mails. Somebody is sending random generated messages, so I am going to delete some of the earlier comments too. Looks like they are not genuine. I agree with your observation.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s